Last night, I went to my second therapy session.
First, let me give you an update on my mental status since my last meeting with Senor Shrink. As a reminder, we had discussed at length the importance of finding balance in your life…between work and play, between selfish actions and selfless actions, etc. I saw very clearly the necessity of the yin and yang in our lives and had made it a point in the last two weeks to really put those ideas into practice. I went to yoga classes, took time by myself to install our iPod docking stereo and listen to music, mediatively and alone…and took more time in the bubble bath, just for me. I spoke up more specifically about things I want out of life and the people in it.
On the whole, my mental state has improved dramatically. I found myself being able to give even more effectively when I took time for myself when I needed it. I found myself resenting less and enjoying the present more when I was able to (at first) force myself to ask for things I wanted and needed. Of course, my whole world isn’t puppy dogs and candy canes yet, but I saw a marked difference…as did the SM.
This week we spoke about the destructive cyclic thinking associated with self-defeat.
There are three steps to experiencing a difficult event. First, the difficult event happens. (They happen to everyone.) Two: Emotions/reactions to those events happen to everyone. The bridge between the two, and the often under-credited #3 of this equation, is our self-talk. The experience we feel is based on what we tell ourselves as precipitated from those events.
Take a sample difficult event: A bad job interview. There are a lot of reasons why an interview doesn’t go as well as planned. Perhaps the interviewer said you weren’t qualified. Maybe the position was already filled. Maybe you were late or forgot a copy of your resume. Perhaps you spilled your morning coffee all over yourself in the car before you got there. All of these smaller events inevitably lead to emotions about the interview. Frustration, disappointment, anger, self-pity, insecurity, helplessness, failure. This is where the self-talk comes in and dictates the spectrum on which you feel each of these emotions - and if what you’re feeling is at an apporpriate level on that spectrum. “I’m clumsy”, “I gave them a terrible first impression”, can lead to “I’m not good enough”, “I’ll never be happy” and ultimately, if not curbed - “I’m a failure…in life”.
There is a big difference between experiencing the event in the present with realistic, logical, evidence-based self-talk…and seeing it through the clouded glasses of self-defeat. And even beyond that, there is a big difference in how one will conduct themselves in the future when someone can delineate the two, living in the former reality and not the latter.
The Shrink and I discussed using self-talk as a tool to help replace the negative, self-defeating thoughts in my head with positive, realistic, reality-based thoughts. He explained that the brain has a very hard time focusing on nothing. So when negative thoughts crop up, it’s imperative to replace them with optimistic, yet realistic thoughts instead. He challenged me to think of contrary statements to what I am feeling to see if what I am processing is appropriate or not.
When faced with the let-down of a failed job interview, instead of telling myself what a failure I am, how I’ll be stuck at my current job forever and that I’ll never be professionally happy, I need to ask myself, what evidence do I REALLY have that says that I’ll be stuck forever and I’m a huge failure? None.
I need to tell myself that I am a valuable asset and have knowledge and education that someone does find vaulable; the contrary evidence is that I’ve been hired before. If I am telling myself I’ll never be happy, what is the evidence that I have that tells me that? Nothing. I need to tell myself that there are a lot of things in my life that do make me happy that I am successful at, such as being a good friend and girlfriend. Maybe the job I went in for wasn’t exactly suited for my talents anyways and I’d end up being dissatisfied there, too. But it’s not that I have evidence that I am stuck in a life sentence.
When given these examples and exercises, they seemed simple enough to put into practice. It was easy to see that I do participate in too much overgeneralization (where this one interview dictates my whole future) and hyperbolization (making situations out to be a lot more catastrophic than they really are); I could see where I could use this in frustrating situations at work and with friends. The only obstacle I could forsee was trying to use this effectively and immediately in more personal situations. When I am more intimately connected to a situation, my senses and the consequences are heightened, and I am afraid that I am prone to throwing these tools out the window and regressing back to writhing in a pool of tears and Kleenex on the bed at 2 a.m. like a sloppy, crazy, hot mess. I have gotten really good at that. Maybe that isn’t a talent I should put on the ol’ resume, though.
He said that practice in simpler, less emotional situations will be the key. Mastering this art in situations in which I am more emotionally removed will prove to be helpful as the predictaments get more complex. I have to believe him; he’s a lot older and wiser than I…and most importantly, he is able to see my life with an objective eye. And that is invaluable at this point.
My homework is to journal out these kind of situations rather than just mushing them around in my big, soft noggin. When a difficult situation comes my way and negative thoughts flow into me, I have to write out the three steps and put myself on the spectrum of appropriateness. This quite deliberate, concrete practice should get me well on the road to changing my thoughts without pen and paper someday in the near future. I’ll be sure to let you know how it goes.